top of page

Letting Data Speak, AI Act!

Case Study

AI-Powered Customer Onboarding Agent for EdTech Mentorship Platform

A leading education technology company specializing in mentorship program design and implementation for higher education institutions and corporate partners. The organization manages large-scale mentorship programs across universities and enterprises, requiring extensive program configuration involving branding, participant models, matching criteria, timelines, flag configurations, and customization settings for each partner institution.

About the Client

A leading education technology company specializing in mentorship program design and implementation for higher education institutions and corporate partners. The organization manages large-scale mentorship programs across universities and enterprises, requiring extensive program configuration involving branding, participant models, matching criteria, timelines, flag configurations, and customization settings for each partner institution.

Untitled design - 2024-09-27T104509.589.png

Challenge

The client's program design and onboarding process was manual, synchronous, and heavily dependent on human labor, creating a critical bottleneck in partner implementation:

  • Manual Data Extraction

  • No Data Reconciliation

  • No Error Handling or Escalation Path


Lengthy Implementation Cycle:


Configuring new and existing partner mentorship programs required 6–8 weeks to complete, involving structured questionnaires covering branding, participation models, matching logic, timelines, flag configurations, and customization preferences.


Reliance on Tribal Knowledge:


The workflow depended heavily on Customer Success Managers (CSMs) and Community Operations Managers (COMs), whose institutional expertise was difficult to scale and transfer. Key decisions regarding program design—such as matching criteria, SSO requirements, and SFTP integrations—resided with individual team members rather than in a systematic, repeatable process.


Manual, Synchronous Communication:


Partners had to coordinate scheduling with CSMs for every design decision, making the process synchronous and slow. There was no self-service mechanism for partners to explore program options, receive data-backed recommendations, or submit design decisions asynchronously.


Scalability Constraints:


As the number of partner institutions grew, the manual process could not scale without proportionally increasing CSM headcount, threatening the company's ability to onboard new partners efficiently.


Risk of Errors and Inconsistencies:


Without automated validation, configurations were susceptible to inconsistencies (e.g., enabling mandatory participation without SSO) and missed requirements, which increased rework and delayed program launches.

Untitled design - 2024-09-27T105551.128.png

Key Results

  • Reduced program implementation timeline from 6–8 weeks to an estimated 1-2 hour cycle by enabling asynchronous, AI-guided program configuration

  • Achieved an average infrastructure cost of approximately $5.32 per new partner onboarding and $0.87 per returning partner onboarding, ensuring cost-effective scalability to 100+ concurrent partner configurations

  • Enabled partners to self-serve the entire program design workflow—covering 68+ configuration decisions across branding, participants, participation models, timelines, flag configuration, and customization—through a conversational AI agent with human-in-the-loop approval

  • Reduced COM/CSM load from 6-8 hours to around 30-60 mins.

Solution

The solution involved designing and deploying a conversational AI Customer Onboarding Agent that replaced static forms with an intelligent, natural-language workflow embedded directly into the client's existing dashboard.


Key Components:

  • Multi-Agent System with LangGraph: A state-machine-based architecture was built using LangGraph on AWS Bedrock AgentCore Runtime. Separate graph flows were implemented for new partners (full questionnaire) and returning partners (delta updates with section summaries). The system comprised specialized nodes—Information Extraction, Rewrite Query, RAG Retrieval, Targeted RAG Retrieval, Section Summary, and Responder—to manage conversation flow, data extraction, and recommendation generation.

  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Pipeline: A Knowledge Base powered by Amazon S3 vector storage was integrated to provide data-backed recommendations using the client's Knowledge Center articles. The agent retrieved relevant articles in real time to answer partner questions, resolve objections, and justify design recommendations with historical performance data.

  • Human-in-the-Loop Workflow: The system flagged complex decisions or partner objections for CSM/COM review rather than generating unsupervised responses. CSMs could track partner progress, review answered and unanswered questions, edit configurations, and approve final designs through a dedicated Program Designer dashboard before automatic program configuration.

  • Context-Aware Conversations: The agent differentiated between new and existing customer workflows, pre-loading historical program data and institutional context for returning partners. CSMs could configure sequence-level context including organization information, previous program details, and historical performance data to inform the agent's recommendations.

  • Structured Configuration UI with Visual Validation: Chat-based design decisions were translated into a structured, editable UI covering sections such as branding, participants, participation models, timelines, flag configuration, and customization. Partners could review, modify, and submit their designs, while CSMs could approve and trigger automatic program configuration—all within the existing dashboard ecosystem.

  • AWS-Native, Scalable Infrastructure: The system was deployed on a secure, highly available AWS architecture within a VPC, leveraging Multi-AZ Lambda functions, API Gateway, S3, Bedrock AgentCore (runtime and memory), and IAM-based internal communication. Infrastructure was provisioned using Terraform (Infrastructure as Code), and the frontend was built in React on the existing Heroku-hosted dashboard with SigV4 authentication.

Untitled design - 2024-09-27T104509.589.png

Technologies Used

  • AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Runtime, Memory), LangGraph

  • Amazon S3 (Vector Storage for RAG, Knowledge Base)

  • AWS Lambda, Amazon API Gateway, AWS VPC (Multi-AZ)

  • PostgreSQL, Terraform (Infrastructure as Code)

  • React, Heroku, Claude (LLM)

Other Case Study Items

Revolutionizing Personal Loans with AI-Driven Underwriting

Revolutionizing Personal Loans with AI-Driven Underwriting

A leading Indian personal loan provider revolutionized their underwriting process by leveraging AI and machine learning to automate 80% of loan decisions. By integrating social and financial data into a sophisticated predictive algorithm, the company drastically reduced decision times to seconds expanded access to underserved segments, and achieved lower default rates compared to human underwriters.

Artificial Intelligence - Powered Tyre Dimension Extraction System

Artificial Intelligence - Powered Tyre Dimension Extraction System

JashDS developed an AI-powered computer vision system for a leading automotive e-commerce platform, enabling accurate extraction of tire dimensions from images. The solution, which increased conversion rates by 25% and reduced customer support inquiries by 80%, utilized advanced technologies such as YoloV8 for instance segmentation and custom-designed augmentation techniques to simplify the online tire purchasing process.

Enhanced Jira Data Analysis for Strategic Insights

Enhanced Jira Data Analysis for Strategic Insights

JashDS developed a flexible framework for analyzing Jira project data that is capable of handling varying export structures and custom fields. The solution leveraged GenAI and LLM technologies to provide actionable insights, identify productivity trends, and uncover potential risks across diverse software projects, resulting in a ___% improvement in team efficiency and a ___% increase in successful project outcomes.

bottom of page